tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559890189880401534.post2411184484411026765..comments2023-06-01T15:23:57.795-05:00Comments on REALITY 101: History Of Government Sponsored TerrorismAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05789750451427167243noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559890189880401534.post-27185857292852548872010-10-06T11:12:04.096-05:002010-10-06T11:12:04.096-05:00Hooray for Harry! He knows a coincidence theorists...Hooray for Harry! He knows a coincidence theorists when he sees one! Peter Power is full of it!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559890189880401534.post-32314947460841562202009-02-24T16:53:00.000-06:002009-02-24T16:53:00.000-06:00From: AndrewDate: 2/24/2009 8:58:19 AMpass this ba...From: Andrew<BR/>Date: 2/24/2009 8:58:19 AM<BR/><BR/>pass this back to him if you can...<BR/>(feel free to add to my case)<BR/> <BR/>The problem isnt that Just you and your company happened to be running excercises that coincided with terrorist attacks.<BR/><BR/>In and of itself, the odds of probability are stacked against this happening even just once - as Pure accidental coincidence only.<BR/><BR/>Not only the same time and day but the exact places at the exact times? And then there is the Bus that was diverted - the only one to blow up was one that was handled --<BR/>HOWEVER on 9/11 the U.S. was also running excercises that actually end up happening, as in the UK.<BR/><BR/>Remeber the Train bombing in Europe?? Again , same thing - excercises being run...<BR/>Then there is the Oaklahoma City - while one lone man has been given the blame, news footage of the day discusses Multiple Bombs in the building and - you guessed it - More Excercises and a bomb squad doing drills that day...<BR/><BR/>Why don;t you try and do a little analysis and see what the mathematical probability of all these events (and there are more) occuring 'randomly' and by 'coincidence'.<BR/> <BR/>They do however show a Pattern.<BR/> <BR/>Thats not "conspiracy theory" as all the events are fact.<BR/><BR/>Critical thinking says to follow the information, no matter where it takes you. <BR/><BR/>Theories of Probability clearly show that this is beyound 'coincidence'.<BR/> <BR/>Then you do your homework and you find out the 1st WTC bombing - as from court records - was all set up and orchestrated by the FBI.<BR/>Look it up, matter of record now - even gave the "terrorists" the bomb to use.<BR/> <BR/>So, when analysing your specific incident - in and of itself it may be possible that by some twisted sort of timing it just Happened to occur as it has. However, when taken in context wrt a series of other events it becomes more Likely to be a deliberate set-up.<BR/>No?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05789750451427167243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559890189880401534.post-56518327395684874342009-02-22T12:19:00.000-06:002009-02-22T12:19:00.000-06:00There has been much nonsense written about why my ...There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.<BR/> <BR/>Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.<BR/><BR/>The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events. <BR/><BR/>As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC). <BR/><BR/>In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed. <BR/><BR/>Of just eight (8) nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without. <BR/><BR/>An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing. <BR/><BR/>For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people. <BR/> <BR/>Peter Power<BR/>Visor ConsultantsPeter Power Visor Consultants Londonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12422201463496926841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559890189880401534.post-89913613037227012912009-02-22T02:55:00.000-06:002009-02-22T02:55:00.000-06:00More Americans Are Saying: “It’s Not Our National ...More Americans Are Saying: “It’s Not Our National Debt” – Join the Revolt!<BR/>Washington has bailed out the banks, Wall Street & their Washington special interests and much of the cost is added to the national debt to by paid by this and future generations while real estate and investments continue to fall. The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/22/2013 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&ref=tsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com